KITNERBOY REDOUBT
Standards · the load-bearing page of this site

A rating is a stopwatch, not a promise

Three families of standards dominate the market, and they do not measure the same thing. Below: what each one puts a technician through, and what the label can and cannot tell you afterwards.

THE STICKER DESCRIBES THE TEST, NOT THE BOX. Two products with the same label can differ by an hour in a real attack.

United States — UL 687

LabelTimeSurfaces testedTools
TL-1515 min net working timeDoor faceHand and power tools, listed set
TL-3030 min net working timeDoor faceSame set, longer clock
TL-30x630 min net working timeAll six sidesSame set
TRTL-30x630 min net working timeAll six sidesAdds a cutting torch
RSC / RSC II5 / 10 minDoor faceResidential level, a different world entirely

“Net working time” is time on the tool, not time in the room. A thirty-minute rating can occupy an attacker for far longer — or, with the right tool and no witnesses, for exactly thirty.

Europe — EN 1143-1

GradeResistance units — partial / complete accessTypical use
Grade 030 / 30 RUHome, modest values; legal minimum for firearms in Germany
Grade I30 / 50 RUHome and small business
Grade II50 / 80 RUBusiness, small cash handling
Grade III80 / 120 RURetail, jewellery, pharmacy
Grade IV120 / 180 RUHigh-value retail
Grade V180 / 270 RUBank-adjacent
Grades VI–XIIIhigherStrongrooms and vault doors, rarely a consumer question

A resistance unit is a scoring system, not a clock: one RU is one minute of work with a tool whose coefficient is 1, and every tool carries its own coefficient — a sledgehammer scores far less per minute than a diamond core drill. Partial access (a hand-sized opening) and complete access (the door open) are scored separately, which is why every grade is written as a pair.

T2 — the part most sites have not updated In April 2019 EN 1143-1 gained new test options: EX (solid explosives), GAS, CD (core drilling) and — the one that matters for ordinary buyers — T2, an attack with an amended tool set: thinner cutting discs, newer thermic lances, more powerful breaking hammers. Grades then read 0 T2, I T2, II T2 … XIII T2.

Why it matters: tested against the T2 set, some high-grade models come out up to two grades lower than their older certificate suggests. A safe certified years ago is not suddenly weaker — but the paper describes an attack with tools that have since been improved. If you are buying today, ask whether the certificate is a T2 one — the full story here.

Russia — GOST R 50862

ClassRoughly comparable toNotes
Class 1EN Grade 0–IOwn tool list, own scoring
Class 2–3EN Grade II–IIICommon in retail and pharmacy
Class 4+EN Grade IV and upBank use, rarely exported

“Roughly comparable” is doing real work in that column. The scales are not interchangeable and no certifier converts between them officially. Neither do we — this is orientation, not equivalence.

Phrases with no standard behind them Bank grade · military grade · burglar-proof · unbreakable · maximum security · fireproof (fire is rated in minutes at a temperature, never absolutely). If a page uses one of these instead of a class, the class is the thing that is missing.